“Readers looking for a simple review of counterfactual histories will find far more than that here. . . . [Gallagher] convincingly demonstrates that counterfactual histories and narratives often grow out of specific developments in a nation's history, such as the challenge to Jim Crow in the postwar US, the state of the nation and society in postwar Britain, and the end of the Cold War. . . .Recommended.”

Choice

“Telling It Like It Wasn’t is a history that modulates into criticism (without ceasing to be history). . . Gallagher writes eloquently of ‘the vitality of the permanently unfinished’, and suggests that counterfactual stories can ‘seem enduring not because they solve problems but because they destabilise solutions.’”

London Review of Books

“Telling It Like It Wasn’t is a deep and authoritative overview, suitably footnoted, of issues that are even more relevant today than in the last century and a half. . .A fascinating book for both historians and the general public.”

SF Commentary

“Masterful, fascinating, and eminently readable.”

Victorian Studies

“Gallagher’s new book is a genuinely original contribution to both the theory (and history) of the novel and the theory of history. Philosophers and historians have been debating the cognitive status of historical narratives for over half a century without taking into account the contributions to theory of narrative made by modern literary scholars. Based on a trove of ‘counterfactualist’ writings that have been little studied until of late, Gallagher’s book sheds new light on the differences between history, myth, fiction, hypotheticals, the historical romance, and fantasy writing. Moreover, her book is mercifully free of jargon, her discussion of ‘counterfactual’ history is subtle and sophisticated, and her analysis of the relation between fiction and hypothesis convincing.”

Hayden White | University Professor of the History of Consciousness, Emeritus, University of California

“At a time when fact itself is under siege, why tarry with thought experiments about pasts that didn't happen? Gallagher's answer is a historicist one: although counterfactual narratives have been with us in many forms since antiquity, their full story has remained untold. Fortunately, we no longer have to live in a timeline where Telling It Like It Wasn't has yet to be written. To read this engrossing book is to be haunted not by lives unled but by previously undermapped regions of history, philosophy, theology, legal reasoning, and literature."

Paul K. Saint-Amour, author of Tense Future: Modernism, Total War, Encyclopedic Form

“This is an outstanding book. Gallagher surveys the phenomenon of counterfactual speculation in history and in fiction, drawing her examples from American, British, and French literature. She proves herself an exemplary literary critic and analyst who brings her examples to life. In addition, she is very sensitive to the theoretical issues that counterfactual speculation raises and deftly commands not only the literary field of counterfactual speculation but also the historical field. There is simply no other book like this.”

Allan Megill, author of Historical Knowledge, Historical Error: A Contemporary Guide to Practice

“A fascinating book. . .Telling It Like It Wasn't is a deep and authoritative overview, suitably footnoted, of issues that are even more relevant today. . .There is probably no other book that has mined the historical counterfactual perspective as comprehensively as Gallagher's.”

Footprint Books

". . . an important and timely text which broadens our thinking about counterfactual thought beyond the alternate history novel, military history essay, and political hypothesis to encompass theological thought, philosophical proposition, and legal argument."

SFRA Review